Representative · Anonymized

Notable
matters.

Representative engagements organized by matter type, role, and technical issue. Entries are illustrative — describing categories of work Daniel typically handles. Parties, dockets, counsel, and identifying details are intentionally omitted; the entries do not name specific cases and are not predictions for any particular future matter.

NOTE: Specific anonymized matter descriptions, with verifiable scope and outcome detail, will be provided to qualified counsel through the case manager on request.

EIGHT MATTER CATEGORIES HUNDREDS OF ENGAGEMENTS · 20 YEARS

01 · MODEL · TRAINING DATA · OUTPUTS

Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

3 REPRESENTATIVE

  • Sole Arbitrator Private commercial arbitration Eight-figure exposure

    Issue · Enterprise customer dispute against an AI vendor over alleged hallucinated outputs in a regulated workflow. Authentication of inference logs and review of system-card representations were the determinative technical questions.

    OUTCOME · Reasoned award addressing the technical and contractual issues; resolution within the procedural calendar.

  • Special Master Federal trade-secret litigation Nine-figure exposure

    Issue · Authored a tiered protective-order framework distinguishing model weights, training data, prompts, and outputs into separate access levels; supervised cleanroom review.

    OUTCOME · Workable protocol adopted by both sides; matter proceeded to merits without further protective-order disputes.

  • Forensic Neutral Pre-suit dispute, technology M&A Confidential valuation

    Issue · Independent assessment of an ML training-data provenance claim affecting the valuation of an acquired model.

    OUTCOME · Written finding accepted by both sides; transaction closed on adjusted terms.

02 · COVERAGE · ATTRIBUTION · DWELL TIME

Cyber Insurance Coverage

3 REPRESENTATIVE

  • Mediator Private mediation following coverage litigation Multi-million-dollar exposure

    Issue · Coverage dispute turning on the dwell-time question — whether the threat actor first gained access pre- or post-binding. Required reading of the IR record under tier-1 protective designation.

    OUTCOME · Settled within ten days of issuance of a memorandum identifying points of consensus and points genuinely in dispute.

  • Mediator Insurance coverage mediation Multi-million-dollar exposure

    Issue · Fraudulent wire-transfer dispute under a cyber policy with a contested computer-fraud trigger; involved analysis of email-authentication records and impersonation methodology.

    OUTCOME · Negotiated resolution within the standard mediation cycle.

  • Sole Arbitrator Private commercial arbitration Eight-figure exposure

    Issue · Coverage dispute under a war-exclusion clause where attribution of the underlying incident was contested.

    OUTCOME · Reasoned award addressing both the technical attribution analysis and the policy-language questions.

03 · CODE · ARCHITECTURE · MISAPPROPRIATION

Trade Secret & Software IP

3 REPRESENTATIVE

  • Forensic Neutral Federal trade-secret litigation Multi-hundred-million-dollar exposure

    Issue · Independent forensic protocol design and execution; chain-of-custody preservation of departing-employee devices; authentication of disputed file-existence questions.

    OUTCOME · Written report adopted by the appointing tribunal; case settled within months of report issuance.

  • Discovery Special Master State court trade-secret matter Confidential valuation

    Issue · Source-code review protocol for proprietary software alleged to have been derived from plaintiff’s codebase. Designed sampling approach, reviewer-credentialing tiers, and expert-comparison framework.

    OUTCOME · Protocol order issued; review proceeded without further disputes.

  • Mediator Pre-suit dispute, venture-backed company Founder-equity dispute

    Issue · Co-founder dispute with allegations of post-departure misappropriation. Forensic evidence preservation handled in parallel.

    OUTCOME · Resolved with negotiated technical-remediation terms.

04 · TAR · CAL · SPOLIATION · PRIVILEGE

eDiscovery & ESI Disputes

3 REPRESENTATIVE

  • eDiscovery Special Master Federal multi-district class action TB-scale ESI

    Issue · Authored ESI protocol; supervised TAR/CAL workflow; resolved real-time discovery disputes; handled privilege-log adequacy challenges.

    OUTCOME · Protocol adopted; class production completed on revised timeline.

  • Discovery Referee Superior Court matter, technical IP Substantial document corpus

    Issue · Real-time resolution of dozens of discovery disputes between the parties over a multi-year period; spoliation findings under FRCP 37(e) standards.

    OUTCOME · Reports to the court; case proceeded efficiently to merits.

  • eDiscovery Special Master Federal mass-tort matter Large-scale environmental litigation

    Issue · ESI protocol authoring for a complex multi-defendant mass tort; cross-border production coordination.

    OUTCOME · Workable protocol implemented across all defendants.

05 · ON-CHAIN · OFF-CHAIN REMEDIES

Smart Contracts & Cryptocurrency

3 REPRESENTATIVE

  • Sole Arbitrator Private commercial arbitration Eight-figure exposure

    Issue · Smart-contract dispute involving a wrong-wallet auto-execution against a counterparty. Contract bytecode audit, on-chain transaction tracing, and cross-border attribution.

    OUTCOME · Reasoned award addressing both on-chain and off-chain remedies.

  • Mediator Pre-suit dispute, decentralized protocol Token valuation dispute

    Issue · Founder/investor dispute concerning protocol governance and token-allocation execution.

    OUTCOME · Negotiated structural resolution.

  • Forensic Neutral Federal regulatory matter Cryptocurrency exchange

    Issue · On-chain forensic analysis of disputed transaction histories and wallet attribution.

    OUTCOME · Written technical findings submitted to the appointing tribunal.

06 · CLASS ACTION · BREACH · GDPR

Privacy & Data Protection

2 REPRESENTATIVE

  • Special Master Federal class-action privacy matter TB-scale ESI; class of millions

    Issue · Authored ESI protocol for a multi-plaintiff privacy matter; supervised data-handling under heightened protective-order tiers; reported findings to the court.

    OUTCOME · Protocol adopted; class production completed.

  • Mediator Pre-suit cross-border breach matter GDPR exposure

    Issue · Multi-jurisdictional breach response with parallel U.S. and EU regulatory exposure; Schrems II considerations on data transfer in the production phase.

    OUTCOME · Coordinated resolution with regulatory closure paths.

07 · INTERNATIONAL · MULTI-PARTY

Cross-Border Commercial

3 REPRESENTATIVE

  • Mediator Pre-suit cross-border partnership Multi-jurisdictional exposure

    Issue · Founder dispute spanning U.S., EU, and Asia operations of a technology and apparel partnership; international discovery coordination.

    OUTCOME · Negotiated dissolution and remediation terms.

  • Sole Arbitrator L.C.I.A. seat Confidential commercial dispute

    Issue · SaaS-platform service-level dispute between an enterprise customer and software vendor; contract interpretation and technical performance analysis.

    OUTCOME · Reasoned award.

  • Sole Arbitrator H.K.I.A.C. seat Confidential commercial dispute

    Issue · Cross-border software licensing dispute with multi-jurisdictional choice-of-law overlay.

    OUTCOME · Reasoned award.

08 · VALIDITY · INFRINGEMENT · DAMAGES

Patent Litigation (Software & Hardware)

2 REPRESENTATIVE

  • Forensic Neutral Federal patent litigation Substantial damages exposure

    Issue · Independent technical assessment of accused software functionality against claim limitations.

    OUTCOME · Written technical findings incorporated into the merits proceedings.

  • Mediator Pre-trial patent matter Multi-million-dollar exposure

    Issue · Validity and infringement issues in a software patent matter; mediated alongside a retired-judge process neutral.

    OUTCOME · Negotiated license framework.

Note on confidentiality: The matters described above are illustrative and intentionally anonymized. Specific party names, docket numbers, counsel of record, jurisdictions, and identifying details have been omitted. The descriptions reflect categories of work and outcome patterns characteristic of Daniel's practice; they do not name specific cases. Past results are inherently fact-specific and do not predict outcomes in any particular future matter.

A matter like one of these?

Begin a confidential intake.

Begin a matter