Each appointment, panel, and publication links to the issuing body where available.
§ 01 · Thesis
FIG. CODE × CASE LAW · WHERE THEY MEET
Most disputes settle when someone in the room can read the source code and the case law.
Tailored Mediation is built for matters that exceed conventional ADR. AI-system liability. Trade-secret theft expressed in commits and access logs. Smart-contract disputes auto-executed before counsel can file. Multi-million-dollar cyber insurance coverage fights with TB-scale forensic records. When the dispute is technical, the neutral must be too.
— D.B.G.
§ 02 · Engagements
Five engagements. One bench.
§ 03 · Match Intake
Tell us about the matter.
We'll route to the right neutral.
Eight considered questions. Five minutes. A confidential match request to a vetted neutral with subject-matter fluency for your specific dispute — Daniel or a curated panelist from our network.
Begin a matterQ.03 / 08 · DISPUTE TYPOLOGY
What is the closest characterization of your matter?
- AI / model output liabilitySELECTED
- Trade secret · software, ML weights, schematics
- Smart contract · on-chain auto-execution
- Cyber insurance coverage
- eDiscovery / ESI dispute
§ 04 · The Future of Resolution
Insights from the bench.
§ 05 · Principal Neutral
Daniel B. Garrie, Esq.
Mediator · Arbitrator · Special Master · Forensic Neutral
Twenty years at the intersection of technology and the law. Adjunct Professor at Harvard. Author of 20+ books and 300+ articles, cited in 500+ articles and judicial opinions. Co-inventor on four cybersecurity patents. Founder of Law & Forensics.
Most recently appointed Special Master in In re: Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation.
Full biography